With crowd density in media, I care less about the prettiest shot and more about the few seconds that reveal how the game behaves when the camera is not showing off.
It starts by admitting what we do not know yet, then looking at the details that would be hard to fake in the final game: how systems interact, how the world reacts, and whether marketing rhythm gives players something to do rather than something to argue about.
A trailer can look amazing and still tell us very little. I would rather pause on details that are hard to fake: traffic rhythm, police pressure, interiors, crowd reactions, and whether Leonida feels different from one place to another.
По сути: В трейлерах GTA VI важны не только красивые кадры. Лучше смотреть на детали, которые показывают поведение мира: трафик, людей, полицию, интерьеры и атмосферу разных районов.
So I would put the question this way: Which group of players would care about crowd density in media the most? What would be the next useful confirmation? What rule would keep this discussion cleaner?
It starts by admitting what we do not know yet, then looking at the details that would be hard to fake in the final game: how systems interact, how the world reacts, and whether marketing rhythm gives players something to do rather than something to argue about.
A trailer can look amazing and still tell us very little. I would rather pause on details that are hard to fake: traffic rhythm, police pressure, interiors, crowd reactions, and whether Leonida feels different from one place to another.
По сути: В трейлерах GTA VI важны не только красивые кадры. Лучше смотреть на детали, которые показывают поведение мира: трафик, людей, полицию, интерьеры и атмосферу разных районов.
So I would put the question this way: Which group of players would care about crowd density in media the most? What would be the next useful confirmation? What rule would keep this discussion cleaner?