With Lucia and Jason dialogue, I care less about the prettiest shot and more about the few seconds that reveal how the game behaves when the camera is not showing off.
It starts by admitting what we do not know yet, then looking at the details that would be hard to fake in the final game: how systems interact, how the world reacts, and whether avoiding spoilers gives players something to do rather than something to argue about.
A trailer can look amazing and still tell us very little. I would rather pause on details that are hard to fake: traffic rhythm, police pressure, interiors, crowd reactions, and whether Leonida feels different from one place to another.
Коротко по-русски: В трейлерах GTA VI важны не только красивые кадры. Лучше смотреть на детали, которые показывают поведение мира: трафик, людей, полицию, интерьеры и атмосферу разных районов.
That is why I would rather discuss one concrete thing: Where should the forum draw the line between fun speculation and bad information? What rule would keep this discussion cleaner?
It starts by admitting what we do not know yet, then looking at the details that would be hard to fake in the final game: how systems interact, how the world reacts, and whether avoiding spoilers gives players something to do rather than something to argue about.
A trailer can look amazing and still tell us very little. I would rather pause on details that are hard to fake: traffic rhythm, police pressure, interiors, crowd reactions, and whether Leonida feels different from one place to another.
Коротко по-русски: В трейлерах GTA VI важны не только красивые кадры. Лучше смотреть на детали, которые показывают поведение мира: трафик, людей, полицию, интерьеры и атмосферу разных районов.
That is why I would rather discuss one concrete thing: Where should the forum draw the line between fun speculation and bad information? What rule would keep this discussion cleaner?