Rumor labels is exactly the kind of topic that can be useful or messy depending on how people frame it.
The part I would push on is keeping speculation useful. If that does not change anything a player can feel, then the topic is probably just pre-launch noise. If it does, it can tell us something real about the direction of GTA VI.
I would keep the thread grounded: what is confirmed, what is a reasonable guess, what is just recycled rumor, and what could mislead new players. Speculation is fine; pretending speculation is news is where the forum gets worse.
Если проще: В слухах и гайдах по GTA VI нужно четко разделять факты, осторожные предположения и выдумки. Тогда обсуждение остается живым, но не превращается в мусор.
Curious where people land on this: Where should the forum draw the line between fun speculation and bad information? What would be the next useful confirmation? Would this help online play or just add noise?
The part I would push on is keeping speculation useful. If that does not change anything a player can feel, then the topic is probably just pre-launch noise. If it does, it can tell us something real about the direction of GTA VI.
I would keep the thread grounded: what is confirmed, what is a reasonable guess, what is just recycled rumor, and what could mislead new players. Speculation is fine; pretending speculation is news is where the forum gets worse.
Если проще: В слухах и гайдах по GTA VI нужно четко разделять факты, осторожные предположения и выдумки. Тогда обсуждение остается живым, но не превращается в мусор.
Curious where people land on this: Where should the forum draw the line between fun speculation and bad information? What would be the next useful confirmation? Would this help online play or just add noise?