Source trust is exactly the kind of topic that can be useful or messy depending on how people frame it.
It starts by admitting what we do not know yet, then looking at the details that would be hard to fake in the final game: how systems interact, how the world reacts, and whether making better buying decisions gives players something to do rather than something to argue about.
I would keep the thread grounded: what is confirmed, what is a reasonable guess, what is just recycled rumor, and what could mislead new players. Speculation is fine; pretending speculation is news is where the forum gets worse.
Если проще: В слухах и гайдах по GTA VI нужно четко разделять факты, осторожные предположения и выдумки. Тогда обсуждение остается живым, но не превращается в мусор.
For me the thread comes down to this: Which group of players would care about source trust the most? What older GTA expectation should GTA VI challenge? What would confuse a new player here?
It starts by admitting what we do not know yet, then looking at the details that would be hard to fake in the final game: how systems interact, how the world reacts, and whether making better buying decisions gives players something to do rather than something to argue about.
I would keep the thread grounded: what is confirmed, what is a reasonable guess, what is just recycled rumor, and what could mislead new players. Speculation is fine; pretending speculation is news is where the forum gets worse.
Если проще: В слухах и гайдах по GTA VI нужно четко разделять факты, осторожные предположения и выдумки. Тогда обсуждение остается живым, но не превращается в мусор.
For me the thread comes down to this: Which group of players would care about source trust the most? What older GTA expectation should GTA VI challenge? What would confuse a new player here?