With UI glimpses, I care less about the prettiest shot and more about the few seconds that reveal how the game behaves when the camera is not showing off.
The part I would push on is marketing rhythm. If that does not change anything a player can feel, then the topic is probably just pre-launch noise. If it does, it can tell us something real about the direction of GTA VI.
A trailer can look amazing and still tell us very little. I would rather pause on details that are hard to fake: traffic rhythm, police pressure, interiors, crowd reactions, and whether Leonida feels different from one place to another.
Русский вывод: В трейлерах GTA VI важны не только красивые кадры. Лучше смотреть на детали, которые показывают поведение мира: трафик, людей, полицию, интерьеры и атмосферу разных районов.
That is why I would rather discuss one concrete thing: Which group of players would care about UI glimpses the most? What would be the next useful confirmation? What visual clue would you watch first?
The part I would push on is marketing rhythm. If that does not change anything a player can feel, then the topic is probably just pre-launch noise. If it does, it can tell us something real about the direction of GTA VI.
A trailer can look amazing and still tell us very little. I would rather pause on details that are hard to fake: traffic rhythm, police pressure, interiors, crowd reactions, and whether Leonida feels different from one place to another.
Русский вывод: В трейлерах GTA VI важны не только красивые кадры. Лучше смотреть на детали, которые показывают поведение мира: трафик, людей, полицию, интерьеры и атмосферу разных районов.
That is why I would rather discuss one concrete thing: Which group of players would care about UI glimpses the most? What would be the next useful confirmation? What visual clue would you watch first?