With wildlife and rural shots, I care less about the prettiest shot and more about the few seconds that reveal how the game behaves when the camera is not showing off.
The part I would push on is marketing rhythm. If that does not change anything a player can feel, then the topic is probably just pre-launch noise. If it does, it can tell us something real about the direction of GTA VI.
A trailer can look amazing and still tell us very little. I would rather pause on details that are hard to fake: traffic rhythm, police pressure, interiors, crowd reactions, and whether Leonida feels different from one place to another.
По сути: В трейлерах GTA VI важны не только красивые кадры. Лучше смотреть на детали, которые показывают поведение мира: трафик, людей, полицию, интерьеры и атмосферу разных районов.
That is why I would rather discuss one concrete thing: Where should the forum draw the line between fun speculation and bad information? What older GTA expectation should GTA VI challenge? Where is the line between fun speculation and misinformation?
The part I would push on is marketing rhythm. If that does not change anything a player can feel, then the topic is probably just pre-launch noise. If it does, it can tell us something real about the direction of GTA VI.
A trailer can look amazing and still tell us very little. I would rather pause on details that are hard to fake: traffic rhythm, police pressure, interiors, crowd reactions, and whether Leonida feels different from one place to another.
По сути: В трейлерах GTA VI важны не только красивые кадры. Лучше смотреть на детали, которые показывают поведение мира: трафик, людей, полицию, интерьеры и атмосферу разных районов.
That is why I would rather discuss one concrete thing: Where should the forum draw the line between fun speculation and bad information? What older GTA expectation should GTA VI challenge? Where is the line between fun speculation and misinformation?