Wildlife encounters could be more than scenery if Rockstar uses it to change the pace of Leonida.
A weak version of this discussion is just “is this good or bad?” A stronger version asks how exploration without markers changes player behavior: what people expect, what they prepare for, and what they stop assuming.
Three things would make the topic more useful:
- reasons to return to a place after the first visit
- differences between neighborhoods, roads, beaches, swamps, and tourist areas
- interiors, weather, traffic, and local routines
По сути: По карте GTA VI главный вопрос не в размере. Важно, чтобы районы отличались ритмом, поведением людей, погодой, трафиком, активностями и причинами возвращаться туда снова.
For me the thread comes down to this: What system would make wildlife encounters matter during actual gameplay? What should a newcomer understand first? What accessibility feature matters most here?
A weak version of this discussion is just “is this good or bad?” A stronger version asks how exploration without markers changes player behavior: what people expect, what they prepare for, and what they stop assuming.
Three things would make the topic more useful:
- reasons to return to a place after the first visit
- differences between neighborhoods, roads, beaches, swamps, and tourist areas
- interiors, weather, traffic, and local routines
По сути: По карте GTA VI главный вопрос не в размере. Важно, чтобы районы отличались ритмом, поведением людей, погодой, трафиком, активностями и причинами возвращаться туда снова.
For me the thread comes down to this: What system would make wildlife encounters matter during actual gameplay? What should a newcomer understand first? What accessibility feature matters most here?